首页> 外文OA文献 >John Smith's settlement?:The work of the 1992-1993 Labour Party Trade Union Links Review Group
【2h】

John Smith's settlement?:The work of the 1992-1993 Labour Party Trade Union Links Review Group

机译:约翰·史密斯的解决方案?:1992-1993年工党工会链接审查小组的工作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this article, I examine the work of the 1992-1993 Labour party trade union links review group. I ask whether the measures it proposed amounted to a new, durable settlement which governed internal relationships within the party. I detail disagreements amongst trade unions over the format that parliamentary selections should take; I evaluate the demands for reform of the party-union link; I ask whether support for reform and for OMOV was falling in the early 1990s; I consider whether unions launched a ‘no say no pay campaign’ with regard to the Labour party; I assess how much restraint was demonstrated at this time by Labour’s affiliated unions; and I consider what might have been at stake in these debates more generally. I conclude that there was considerable antagonism in party-union relations during the early 1990s and that the work of the review group did not amount to an enduring settlement
机译:在本文中,我研究了1992-1993年工党工会链接审查小组的工作。我问它提出的措施是否等于新的,持久的解决方案,支配着党内的内部关系。我详细介绍了工会之间在议会选举中应该采取的形式上的分歧。我评估了改革党政联系的要求;我问在1990年代初期,对改革和对OMOV的支持是否在下降?我考虑工会是否针对工党发起了“不说不收费运动”。我评估了工党所属工会目前表现出的克制力;我认为,这些辩论可能更普遍地涉及到什么。我的结论是,在1990年代初,党与工会之间存在很大的对抗,而审查小组的工作并不意味着持久解决。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wickham-Jones, Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2018
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号